On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:06:46AM -0400, Mark Wagner wrote:
On 05/19/2011 03:34 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Hi Mark,
I think that maybe I didn't fully understand the entire context.
Well I wasn't sure either if the problem was lack
of expressivity or some problem in the syntax :-)
My main goal is to make sure that we consider the differences
between NUMA and simple CPU pinning. After a rereading the threads
and some conversations it appears that you are doing that.
Ah, good, hopefully you will be able to fully check the result soon
Sorry for the noise on this issue
Well I prefer a bit of noise and making sure things are implemented
fully than pushing ode that would not be adequate, so no problem ! :-)
btw - I must say that I think that the libvirt team is doing a
great job overall in getting support for the features that are needed
to achieve good to top performance from KVM. I actually based a lot of
my Summit presentation around using libvirt and virt-manager. Once NUMA
support is in, I expect that we will see some SPECvirt submissions that are
based on libvirt. Thanks for all of the hard work!
Thanks for the kind words, hopefully we will be able to get all of
the results using libvirt soon :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/