On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 12:47 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
[...]
@@ -170,6 +150,11 @@ mymain(void)
char *fakerootdir;
struct testQemuInfo info;
virQEMUDriverConfigPtr cfg = NULL;
+ virHashTablePtr capslatest = NULL;
+
+ capslatest = testQemuGetCapsLatest();
+ if (!capslatest)
+ abort();
Woah, that's a bit harsh, isn't it? How about a nice and polite
return EXIT_FAILURE;
instead? :)
[...]
@@ -192,11 +177,14 @@ mymain(void)
# define DO_TEST_FULL(name, when, gic, ...) \
do { \
- if (testInfoSetCommon(&info, gic) < 0) { \
+ if (testQemuInfoSetArgs(&info, capslatest, \
+ ARG_GIC, gic, \
+ ARG_QEMU_CAPS, __VA_ARGS__, QEMU_CAPS_LAST, \
+ ARG_END) < 0 || \
+ qemuTestCapsCacheInsert(driver.qemuCapsCache, info.qemuCaps) < 0) { \
I haven't really spent any time digging, but that call to
qemuTestCapsCacheInsert() looks odd to me. What exactly is the point
in caching if we're going to be using a different set of capabilities
pretty much every single time?
Considering it is pre-existing, of course, your change is perfectly
fine. Feel free to investigate further, though :)
Additional note: xml2argv calls this in the test function rather than
in the corresponding macro, and it would be nice if they would be
made consistent. Follow-up material, of course.
With the abort() call replaced with something more gentle,
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna(a)redhat.com>
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization