On 01/10/2013 12:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>* libvirt.spec.in: Add some indentation to make it easier to follow
>various conditionals.
>---
> libvirt.spec.in | 858 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 428 insertions(+), 430 deletions(-)
>
Painful experience makes me agree that the unindented nested %ifs
decrease the readability of the spec file and thus would be in favor
of this patch.
However, indentation seems to be uncustomary. On the other hand, it
doesn't seem to be explicitly forbidden, looking at e.g.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
Any packager here that wants to throw in 2 cents?
IIUC, RPM will expand macros *anywhere* in the spec file, even
in places you don't want it to like comments ! So I don't think
adding some whitespace will harm things
Daniel
--
|: