Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:14:39AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> This close(fd) is reachable with an "fd" of -1 via
> the "goto cleanup" just before &fd is first set.
> While closing(-1) is not a big problem, it is a failing
> syscall, and would show up on an strace audit, not to mention
> the coverity and maybe-clang warnings.
>
> >From c69369c445be53f12ec09a176fd477b9ff16bbff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <meyering(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:11:49 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] storage_backend.c: avoid closing a negative file descriptor
>
> * src/storage/storage_backend.c (virStorageBackendRunProgRegex):
> Don't close a negative (read-only) file descriptor.
> ---
> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend.c b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> index bc656f2..84eb8aa 100644
> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> /*
> * storage_backend.c: internal storage driver backend contract
> *
> - * Copyright (C) 2007-2009 Red Hat, Inc.
> + * Copyright (C) 2007-2010 Red Hat, Inc.
> * Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Daniel P. Berrange
> *
> * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> @@ -1326,8 +1326,10 @@ virStorageBackendRunProgRegex(virConnectPtr conn,
>
> if (list)
> fclose(list);
> - else
> - close(fd);
> + else {
> + if (0 <= fd)
> + close(fd);
> + }
Can you put conditionals the normal way around with variable being tested
coming first.
Yeah. Forgot.
"Normal" is context sensitive.
In many other places where I contribute, "normal" means "<" and
"<=",
but no (or very few) uses of ">" or ">=". Definitely an
acquired habit.