On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:10:55PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > > So how about storing 2 sets of expected data for this test case.
> > > >
> >
> > Two is not enough. My clang 5.0.1 produces a test that displays the
> > monkeys correctly, but does not count their width properly:
>
> Is this a different bug though ? The issue with iswprint() is varying
> according to glibc version, not compiler version.
>
The broken setup is:
sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r9
sys-devel/clang-5.0.1
It works on:
sys-libs/glibc-2.26-r7
with either of:
sys-devel/clang-5.0.1
sys-devel/clang-6.0.1
So yes, it is a glibc bug.
Depending on the version, either just wcwidth returns incorrect values
for the monkeys (my case) or iswprint considers them non-printable.
It sounds like in your case we're genuinely broken in the virsh
code, not merely tests broken.
I wonder if we need extra logic in the virsh code to handle escaping
for the cases where wcwidth is returning wrong data, so we still get
column layout correct ?
> So I wonder if the clang problem you mention is something that
can be
> fixed in some way ?
>
Nope, red herring. My maint point was that there are more than 2
possible results.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|