On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 02:45:41PM +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:35:04PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:50:07PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >
> >> Disk devices can be referenced by name in Xen, e.g. when modifying
> >> their configuration or remvoving them. As such, don't search
> >> xenstore for a device ID corresponding to the disk device. Instead,
> >> search the disks contained in the domain definition and use the
> >> disk's target name if found.
> >>
> >> This approach allows removing a disk when domain is inactive. We
> >> obviously can't search xenstore when the domain is inactive.
> >>
> >
> > This sounds reasonable, but I'm wondering if old XenD support the
> > lookup-based on name ?
> >
>
> Yes, I had thought about this as well. Guess it depends on how old we
> are talking about. It exists in Xen 3.1.x and newer. I wonder if we
> should even care about Xen 3.0.x. The upstream tree hasn't been touched
> in 3 years.
Well we still ship this, so it would be appreciated if it didn't
broke if libvirt got updated for some reasons ;-)
Yep, RHEL-5 still ships with Xen 3.0.x series & we aim to support that
in libvirt. I think we can probably just make your new approach be
conditional on the xendConfigVersion variable we already have.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://deltacloud.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|