On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 01:15:16PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 9/26/19 6:18 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56:55AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > virQEMUDriverConfigPtr can be auto-unref for the great majority
> > of the uses made in qemu_driver, sparing us a virObjectUnref()
> > call and sometimes a whole 'cleanup' label.
> >
> > This patch changes virQEMUDriverConfigPtr declarations to
> > use VIR_AUTOUNREF(). 'cleanup' labels were deleted when
> > applicable.
> >
> > This is the last part of this change. All but one* instance of
> > virQEMUDriverConfigPtr were changed to use VIR_AUTOUNREF().
> > 'cleanup' labels were deleted when applicable.
> >
> > * qemuStateInitialize: we can't auto-unref the pointer since we're
> > initializing the qemu_driver object with it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413(a)gmail.com>
> > ---
> I know you focused on virQEMUDriverConfigPtr primarily, but since you're
> following up with VIR_AUTOFREE and touching qemu_driver only, I'd like to do a
> better job and use VIR_AUTOUNREF at many more places across the file for:
>
> virCapsPtr caps
> virConnectPtr conn
> qemuDomainSaveCookiePtr cookie
> virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps
> qemuBlockJobDataPtr job
> virDomainCapsPtr domCaps
> virNetworkPtr network
No problem. Should I squash the first 3 patches of this series into a single
I would have squashed those 3 into a single one before pushing anyway.
one that will touch only virQEMUDriverConfigPtr and then make one
patch
for each pointer type that's changed?
Ultimately I'd have all the VIR_AUTOUNREF changes touching the same file in a
single patch, but for review purposes it may be even better to have them split
in order to separate the changes I've already reviewed and the ones you'll
introduce.
Erik