On 5/13/2024 8:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Validate that it is possible to pass 'parameter=1' for any
SMP topology
parameter, since unsupported parameters are implicitly considered to
always have a value of 1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
index 56165e6644..56ce5128f1 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
@@ -330,6 +330,14 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_valid[] = {
.config = SMP_CONFIG_GENERIC(T, 8, T, 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 16),
.expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 4, 2, 16),
.expect_prefer_cores = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 4, 2, 16),
+ }, {
+ /*
+ * Unsupported parameters are always allowed to be set to '1'
+ * config: -smp
8,books=1,drawers=1,sockets=2,modules=1,dies=1,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=8
cores=2 not 4.
+ * expect: cpus=8,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=2,maxcpus=8 */
+ .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_FULL_TOPO(8, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 8),
+ .expect_prefer_sockets = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
+ .expect_prefer_cores = CPU_TOPOLOGY_GENERIC(8, 2, 2, 2, 8),
},
};