On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 18:11 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
+virtsecretd.service: secret/virtsecretd.service.in
$(top_builddir)/config.status
+ $(AM_V_GEN)sed $(VIRTSECRETD_UNIT_VARS) < $< > $@-t && mv $@-t $@
+
+virtsecret%.socket: remote/libvirt%.socket.in $(top_builddir)/config.status
+ $(AM_V_GEN)sed $(VIRTSECRETD_UNIT_VARS) < $< > $@-t && mv $@-t $@
+
+secret/virtsecretd.conf: remote/libvirtd.conf.in
+ $(AM_V_GEN)sed \
+ -e '/[@]CUT_ENABLE_IP[@]/,/[@]END[@]/d' \
+ -e 's/[@]DAEMON_NAME[@]/virtsecretd/' \
+ < $^ > $@
Oh, you didn't replace $^ with $< here!
+secret/virtsecretd.aug: remote/libvirtd.aug.in
+ $(AM_V_GEN)$(SED) \
+ -e '/[@]CUT_ENABLE_IP[@]/,/[@]END[@]/d' \
+ -e 's/[@]DAEMON_NAME[@]/virtsecretd/' \
+ -e 's/[@]DAEMON_NAME_UC[@]/Virtsecretd/' \
+ $< > $@
+
+secret/test_virtsecretd.aug: remote/test_libvirtd.aug.in \
+ secret/virtsecretd.conf $(AUG_GENTEST)
+ $(AM_V_GEN)$(AUG_GENTEST) secret/virtsecretd.conf \
+ $(srcdir)/remote/test_libvirtd.aug.in | \
+ $(SED) -e '/[@]CUT_ENABLE_IP[@]/,/[@]END[@]/d' \
+ -e 's/[@]DAEMON_NAME[@]/virtsecretd/' \
+ -e 's/[@]DAEMON_NAME_UC[@]/Virtsecretd/' \
+ > $@ || rm -f $@
All of the issues mentioned in the previous patch unsurprisingly
show up here as well, and they should similarly be addressed. Just
to reiterate, the secret/virtsecretd.aug rule is the one that should
be used as a model.
The comments above also apply to patches 22-32.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization