On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:48:27PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
On 1/21/20 10:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:24:13PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> > This attribute is only used for virtio-net devices, so it is stored in
> > the virtio part of the anonymous union in virDomainNetDef::driver. An
> I'm not convinced that storing it only for virtio-net is the
> right approach. This feels like a generic concept, that just
> happens to only be implemented by virtio-net in QEMU today.
> IOW, it is valid to store it in the virDOmainNetDef in a
> place that's generally applicable. Any restriction to virtio-net
> belongs in the QEMU driver, rather than the XML parser.
Agreed, although in light of your comment on 8/12 (suggesting we just create
an entire new subelement), I guess the point is moot :-)
Or rather this point just reinforces comment 8 :-)
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|