On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:55:48PM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 10/06/2011 01:36 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
>Hi Eric,
>On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:50:46AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>
>>These three errors should probably all be changed away from
>>VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR into something more useful, but I'm not sure
>>whether that would be VIR_ERR_CONF_SYNTAX,
>>VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, or something else.
>I was uncertain about the error codes too, that's why I kept
>VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR as used by other functions in this file. I'd
>opt for VIR_ERR_CONF_SYNTAX.
We really need to agree on a policy on which code to use for which
type of errors, write it down, then go through the code and correct
everything that's wrong. INTERNAL_ERROR is used *a lot* in XML
parsing where it obviously shouldn't be. Much of it is probably code
written before the CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, XML_ERROR, and CONF_SYNTAX
codes were added, but I'd wager just as much is due to people
writing new code who look to the existing code for guidelines (I
know I've done this a lot, and continue to be confused about which
code to use in a lot of cases - heck, this is the first I've noticed
CONF_SYNTAX, and I'm not sure when it would be appropriate to use
that vs. XML_ERROR).
We're not parsing XML here but xen configuration so CONF_SYNTAX fits
better. When parsing XML XML_ERROR makes more sense but you're right
that's mostly guessing at the moment.
Cheers,
-- Guido