Il 22/08/2013 11:37, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> No, you're not misunderstanding the discussion.
>
> Depending on the priorities of the pvpanic and legacy-DMA regions, it
> would break DMA channel 0. Channel 0 is (was) used for DRAM refresh, so
> it should not have any visible effect. However, it may not be entirely
> disabling pvpanic, just making it mostly invisible.
>
> Paolo
Ugh.
And now that Paolo pointed out that nothing terrible
happens even when migrating from host with pvpanic
enabled to host with pvpanic disabled, I'm inclined
to think we should just disable pvpanic in 1.5.X.
Thoughts?
You'd obviously have no objection from me.
Paolo