Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your comments.
I will not change public ABI nor break RPC.
I wonder if you would agree with extend virHostCPUGetInfoPopulateLinux to get l3 cache
size ?
Such as:
virHostCPUGetInfoPopulateLinux(FILE *cpuinfo,
virArch arch,
unsigned int *cpus,
unsigned int *mhz,
unsigned int *nodes,
unsigned int *sockets,
unsigned int *cores,
unsigned int *threads,
unsigned int *l3_cache) ←---------
virHostCPUGetInfoPopulateLinux is doing parsing /proc/cpuinfo , so I think it’s the best
way to get l3 cache size.
cat /proc/cpuinfo
…
cpu MHz : 2821.435
cache size : 56320 KB
…
Best Regards
Eli Qiao(乔立勇)OpenStack Core team OTC Intel.
--
On 10/01/2017, 5:44 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:11:03PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
This patch extends l3 cache infomation to nodeinfo output.
Signed-off-by: Eli Qiao <liyong.qiao(a)intel.com>
---
include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h | 1 +
src/nodeinfo.c | 3 ++-
src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 1 +
src/test/test_driver.c | 1 +
src/util/virhostcpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
src/util/virhostcpu.h | 3 ++-
src/util/virhostcpupriv.h | 3 ++-
tests/virhostcputest.c | 3 ++-
tools/virsh-host.c | 1 +
9 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h b/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h
index 07b5d15..ba926df 100644
--- a/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h
+++ b/include/libvirt/libvirt-host.h
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct _virNodeInfo {
processors in case of unusual NUMA topology*/
unsigned int threads; /* number of threads per core, 1 in case of
unusual numa topology */
+ unsigned int l3_cache; /* l3 cache in kilobytes */
};
NACK, it is *forbidden* to change public structs as this breaks
ABI compatibility.
Okay, get it.
diff --git a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
index b846ef2..6a16b4e 100644
--- a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
+++ b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
@@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ struct remote_node_get_info_ret { /* insert@1 */
int sockets;
int cores;
int threads;
+ int l3_cache;
};
Likewise this breaks RPC compatibility.
This info wil need to be reported in the capabilities XML instead.
Sure.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|