Re: [PATCH 0/2] libxl: Support custom EFI firmware path

On 3/10/23 06:58, Michal Prívozník wrote: > BTW: what's your view on bumping minimal XEN version from 4.9 to at > least 4.10 (or even something newer)? That way we could drop some code > (at least). We could drop a fair bit of code by bumping the minimum version to 4.13. That would allow us to unconditionally set LIBXL_API_VERSION to 0x041300 and drop support for the old 0x040500. We got stuck there since Xen didn't advertise support for 0x040700 and 0x040800 until commit c3999835df2, which was included in 4.13 - opps! According to repology Debian 11: 4.14.x Fedora 37: 4.16.x openSUSE Leap15.4/SLE15 SP4: 4.16.x Ubuntu 22.10: 4.16.x Maybe bumping the minimum version to 4.13 is a viable proposition?