Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] conf: Introduce viremulator_capabilities
On 06/24/2014 03:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> We also have a <features> subelement of <guest> in the
<capabilities>
> XML which is used for a similar thing although it doesn't support a
> per-machine-type output, only per-binary capabilities. Should we add
> this more granular approach and abandon the old one?
Yes, we should stop adding stuff related to the guest to the main
<capabilities> XML since it doesn't scale.
Oh phooey - I just proposed yet another feature there:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-June/msg01097.html
I'd like to turn on a witness for active commit support in the same
release as we turn on the qemu implementation (and I'm hoping it still
makes libvirt 1.2.6 - we haven't frozen yet, but it's near the end of
the month, and we're still waiting on some patches to make it into
qemu.git). If <features> is not the right place, then where should I
advertise it?
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 604 bytes)