On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:28 PM Erik Skultety <eskultet(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:02:21PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass(a)gmail.com>
> ---
> src/test/test_driver.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> index ab0f8b06d6..56f08fc3d2 100755
> --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> @@ -3629,6 +3629,137 @@ static int testDomainSetMetadata(virDomainPtr dom,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#define TEST_TOTAL_CPUTIME 48772617035
Let's be explicit with ullong ^here by adding LL
Oops. I had seen Daniel's comment but forgot to apply.
> +
> +static int
> +testDomainGetDomainTotalCpuStats(virTypedParameterPtr params,
> + int nparams)
indent is off
> +{
> + if (nparams == 0) /* return supported number of params */
> + return 3;
> +
> + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[0], VIR_DOMAIN_CPU_STATS_CPUTIME,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG, TEST_TOTAL_CPUTIME) <
0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (nparams > 1 &&
> + virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[1],
> + VIR_DOMAIN_CPU_STATS_USERTIME,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG, 5540000000) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (nparams > 2 &&
> + virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[2],
> + VIR_DOMAIN_CPU_STATS_SYSTEMTIME,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG, 6460000000) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (nparams > 3)
> + nparams = 3;
> +
> + return nparams;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int
> +testDomainGetPercpuStats(virTypedParameterPtr params,
> + unsigned int nparams,
> + int start_cpu,
> + unsigned int ncpus,
> + int total_cpus)
> +{
> + size_t i;
> + int need_cpus;
> + int param_idx;
> + int ret = -1;
@ret is unnecessary, see below
> +
> + /* return the number of supported params */
> + if (nparams == 0 && ncpus != 0)
> + return 2;
> +
> + /* return total number of cpus */
> + if (ncpus == 0) {
> + ret = total_cpus;
> + goto cleanup;
return total_cpus;
> + }
> +
> + if (start_cpu >= total_cpus) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
> + _("start_cpu %d larger than maximum of %d"),
> + start_cpu, total_cpus - 1);
> + goto cleanup;
return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* return percpu cputime in index 0 */
> + param_idx = 0;
> +
> + /* number of cpus to compute */
> + need_cpus = MIN(total_cpus, start_cpu + ncpus);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < need_cpus; i++) {
> + if (i < start_cpu)
> + continue;
How about initializing i = start_cpu straight away instead?
> + int idx = (i - start_cpu) * nparams + param_idx;
> + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[idx],
> + VIR_DOMAIN_CPU_STATS_CPUTIME,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG,
> + (TEST_TOTAL_CPUTIME / total_cpus) + i) < 0)
I'd strongly prefer if we didn't perform the division in each iteration,
I think the compiler will be smart enough to optimize this? But ok
sure, let's not make assumptions.
the "+ i" also seems unnecessary.
I just added it in order for different CPUs to return different values.
+1, +2 etc. are trivial quantities so the results still make sense imo
> + goto cleanup;
return -1;
> + }
> +
> + /* return percpu vcputime in index 1 */
> + param_idx = 1;
> +
> + if (param_idx < nparams) {
> + for (i = start_cpu; i < need_cpus; i++) {
> + int idx = (i - start_cpu) * nparams + param_idx;
> + if (virTypedParameterAssign(¶ms[idx],
> + VIR_DOMAIN_CPU_STATS_VCPUTIME,
> + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_ULLONG,
> + (TEST_TOTAL_CPUTIME / total_cpus) -
1234567890 + i) < 0)
Same as above...
> + goto cleanup;
return -1;
> + }
> + param_idx++;
> + }
> +
> + ret = param_idx;
return param_idx;
> + cleanup:
> + return ret;
Drop the cleanup label.
Yeah, totally. That was a leftover from previous code and I didn't
realize it after adjusting.
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int
> +testDomainGetCPUStats(virDomainPtr dom,
> + virTypedParameterPtr params,
> + unsigned int nparams,
> + int start_cpu,
> + unsigned int ncpus,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> + testDriverPtr privconn = dom->conn->privateData;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + virCheckFlags(VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
> +
> + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (virDomainObjCheckActive(vm) < 0)
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + if (start_cpu == -1)
> + ret = testDomainGetDomainTotalCpuStats(params, nparams);
> + else
> + ret = testDomainGetPercpuStats(params, nparams, start_cpu, ncpus,
> + privconn->nodeInfo.cores);
> +
> + cleanup:
> + virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> static int
> testDomainSendProcessSignal(virDomainPtr dom,
> long long pid_value,
> @@ -8552,6 +8683,7 @@ static virHypervisorDriver testHypervisorDriver = {
> .domainSendKey = testDomainSendKey, /* 5.5.0 */
> .domainGetMetadata = testDomainGetMetadata, /* 1.1.3 */
> .domainSetMetadata = testDomainSetMetadata, /* 1.1.3 */
> + .domainGetCPUStats = testDomainGetCPUStats, /* 5.6.0 */
> .domainSendProcessSignal = testDomainSendProcessSignal, /* 5.5.0 */
> .connectGetCPUModelNames = testConnectGetCPUModelNames, /* 1.1.3 */
> .domainManagedSave = testDomainManagedSave, /* 1.1.4 */
> --
I'll adjust the code before merging.
Sure, thanks for the review!
Ilias
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet(a)redhat.com>