On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 07:34 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
On 02/21/2018 09:14 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
[...]
> +static int
> +qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateControllerPCI(const virDomainControllerDef *cont,
> + const virDomainDef *def,
> + virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps)
> +
> +{
> + const virDomainPCIControllerOpts *pciopts = &cont->opts.pciopts;
> + const char *model = virDomainControllerModelPCITypeToString(cont->model);
> + const char *modelName =
virDomainControllerPCIModelNameTypeToString(pciopts->modelName);
> +
> + if (!model) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + _("Unknown virDomainControllerModelPCI value:
%d"),
> + cont->model);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + if (!modelName) {
> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> + _("Unknown virDomainControllerPCIModelName value:
%d"),
> + pciopts->modelName);
> + return -1;
> + }
(meant to send this before, but kept forgetting...)
1) I thought modelName wasn't set for pci-root. Doesn't the above cause
a validation error in that case? (too early in the day, haven't tried it)
The default value is _MODEL_NAME_NONE aka zero, which is still part
of the enumeration, so virDomainControllerPCIModelNameTypeToString()
won't return NULL and no error will be raised. For pSeries guests,
it will be set to _MODEL_NAME_SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE so once again no
problem there.
2) danpb made a nice new function to standardize/simplify errors of
the
above type: virReportEnumRangeError().
His efforts on switch normalization and me rebasing this series
happened pretty much at the same time; more specifically, the
function you're talking about was introduced in 3b1020ac805e, while
my series is based on the earlier f565321b26df.
I guess this means another rebase! Yay! \o/
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization