Re: [Libvir] Re: Next features and target for development
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:05:11AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
DV> you really want a pointer to an existing connection, not an
URI
DV> and hostname. Sure you could get the virConnectPtr based on the
DV> URI, but it's better to rely on the user to do that step
DV> independantly.
So that implies that in order to perform a migration with libvirt, the
user will need the libvirt daemon running and accessible on the remote
machine, is that right?
yes
If so, why should this be necessary?
Because from an API point of view if you do a migration to some
hypervisor, you're likely to need a connection to that hypervisor in
the application anyway, so it's better to have the registration and
the migration separate. Simplifies coding, error handling etc ...
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/