Re: [Libvir] [RFC] Linux-VServer support

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 05:14:10PM +0100, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote: > Daniel Veillard wrote: > >Are the parameters for the scheduler all integers ? If you really > >never end up with an information set more structured than that then > > > > <scheduler fill_rate1='100' interval1='1000' fill_rate2='25' > > interval2='1000' > > idle_time='1'/> > > > >would probably be simpler. The question is would other kind of scheduler > >use more structured parameters ? Seems to me it's not the case and that > >ad-hoc parsing to convert {name, value} pairs would just work. > > Actually, the same settings can be applied to the CPUs separately, e.g. > <scheduler> > <param name='fill_rate1'>100</param> > <param name='interval1'>1000</param> > <cpu id='0'> > <param name='idle_time'>1</param> > <param name='fill_rate2'>25</param> > <param name='interval2'>1000</param> > </cpu> > </scheduler> > should at some point be possible (it's not in the current patch). Hum, I see, first time I see such fine grained scheduling, good to know, thanks ! I still find that <scheduler fill_rate1='100' interval1='1000'> <cpu id='0' idle_time='1' fill_rate2='25' interval2='1000'/> </scheduler> would be better than adding the arbitrary <param> element.