On 03/16/2018 09:39 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 03/08/2018 11:07 AM, Farhan Ali wrote:
> A test case to test the virtio-gpu-ccw device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml | 18 ++++++++++
> tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.args | 25 ++++++++++++++
> tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 7 ++++
> .../video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 14 ++++++++
> 7 files changed, 171 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.args
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw-auto.xml
> create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/video-virtio-gpu-ccw.xml
>
The tests look OK - could have been merged with the "functionality"
patch, but it's OK that they're separate - as long as they exist it's a
good thing.
I assume the xml2xml output would be "valid" after the "capability"
patch - if so you could extract it into it's own patch if you felt
really compelled to do so.
John
I just feel it's easier to understand to have them all in one patch :)