Re: [libvirt] leak? xenUnifiedOpen

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 04:52:24AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:49:39PM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: > > ==5486== 184 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 18 > > ==5486== at 0x4C20111: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397) > > ==5486== by 0x4E3ADFD: __virAlloc (memory.c:100) > > ==5486== by 0x4E4AF21: xenUnifiedOpen (xen_unified.c:264) > > ==5486== by 0x4E3A005: do_open (libvirt.c:777) > > ==5486== by 0x4009D7: main (in > > /home/skinkie/development/htdocs/cherokee/experiment) > > > > > > Maybe valgrind is over active, because I see the free code at the close > > connection, and my own code is closing it... > > I can see a possibility, for example if xenUnifiedOpen is called > multipl time on the same connection but the first time it exits on > line 332 of xenUnifiedOpen(). That error exit leaves the routine > without deallocating the priv block and conn->privateData is not > set back to NULL. Yes, we definitely need to free the 'priv' data on line 332.