On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 04:35:34PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 05:39:51PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:29:07PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Another small issue is that I have the clone flags defined in
> > <linux/sched.h> but not in <sched.h> so I had to add that include
> > to get the module to compile, lxcCheckContainerSupport() check
> > then passes on my Fedora-8 2.6.24 kernel.
>
> I filed
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438542
>
> to request the flags are added to sched.h too, but we should just #define
> them in the driver as we do for Xen hypervisor constants. This avoids a
> hard dependancy between the kernel used for compile, vs running.
Is that really better than #include <linux/sched.h> ?
That code is linux specific after all ..
Yes it is questionable, but GLibC already contains all the other CLONE_XXX
flags which are Linux specific, so I figured we might as well see if they
want to include the new ones too. In any case I figure we should #ifdef &
#define the new constants in lxc_driver.c, because many people's kernel
headers lag behind the kernel they're compiling for. It is only recent Fedora
practice to actually have the kernel headers synced to real kernel tree.
Dan.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|