On 03/18/2016 03:05 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 03/08/2016 11:39 AM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Judging by how the whitelist has skewed quite far from the original
> error message, I think it's better to just drop these.
>
> If someone wants to revive this check I suggest implementing it on
> a per-HV driver basis with PostParse callbacks.
Definitely the error messages for the current checks are incorrect, and
certain types that are allowed here would actually be invalid for some
hypervisors/machinetypes (the example you gave me in IRC was that vmware
doesn't have virtio-mmio, nor do most qemu machinetypes), so you are correct
that the proper place for at least some of the validation is in a post-parse
callback.
There is some value in the current validation, but it's dubious since any
failure would have led to a misleading error message. Based on that I say ACK
to this, but someone should put "improve address type validation in postparse"
on their todo list :-)
Thanks, pushed. I'll add it to
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/BiteSizedTasks
- Cole