On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:08:10PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:38:15PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> > > There are some devices which we are not able to parse yet, in these
> > > cases a runtime warning is printed to tell what's going on.
> >
> > Actually I see that most of the device types are not being handled.
> > I would suggest we implement all the cases before merging this or
> > otherwise we'll easily forget about this. Yes the warning won't let us
> > forget but I don't think emitting a warning for each unimplemented
> > type (by the library itself) is a good idea since these warnings are
> > visible to users/app developers and they are useless for them.
>
> Agreed, the way we deal with the XML docs ensures we preserve
> any parts of the DOM we don't know about. IMHO we should only
> emit a warning if there is a bit of the DOM we don't expect
> and we are loosing that data during the requested manipulation.
I'll change these warnings to g_debug then
OK, I'll put this on my TODO list then so we don't forget. :)
--
Regards,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
FSF member#5124