Re: [libvirt] libvirt vs XenAPI
Hi, Alain
I guess Daniel says xend issue.(since it relates to XenAPI)
As for hypervisor, You are correct in RHEL5.2 and CentOS5.2.
Current RHEL/Xen is very complex compared to upstream Xen.
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
"Alain Barthe" <ab266061(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/9/4 Daniel Veillard <veillard(a)redhat.com>
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 06:09:43PM +0200, atif bajwa wrote:
> > Just quick question,
> > what version of Xen/XenApi is packaged in RHEL 5.1/5.2. Can I remotely
> > access it using XML-RPC API or not?
>
> RHEL-5.2 has xen-3.0.3, and that will stay the same for the lifetime
> of RHEL5. There is no XenAPI for this, as Dan Berrange told you
> already. And for remote access you have libvirt support.
On CentOS-5.2 (same as RedHat, IFAIK), xen is 3.1.2. Don't believe rpm
version, check "xm info" instead.
>
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
> daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
> http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
>
> --
> Libvir-list mailing list
> Libvir-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
>