'test12' was testing two distinct operations on two instances of a
bitmap. Split it up into 'test12a' and 'test12b' so that the
'bitmap'
variable is not reused.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa(a)redhat.com>
---
tests/virbitmaptest.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/virbitmaptest.c b/tests/virbitmaptest.c
index 687b5f87af..32187ebec4 100644
--- a/tests/virbitmaptest.c
+++ b/tests/virbitmaptest.c
@@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ test11(const void *opaque)
/* test self-expanding bitmap APIs */
static int
-test12(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
+test12a(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
{
virBitmapPtr map = virBitmapNewEmpty();
int ret = -1;
@@ -646,7 +646,20 @@ test12(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
TEST_MAP(151, "128");
+ ret = 0;
+
+ cleanup:
virBitmapFree(map);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+static int
+test12b(const void *opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED)
+{
+ virBitmapPtr map = virBitmapNewEmpty();
+ int ret = -1;
+
if (!(map = virBitmapParseUnlimited("34,1023")))
goto cleanup;
@@ -829,7 +842,9 @@ mymain(void)
TESTBINARYOP("0-3", "0,^0", "0,^0", test11);
TESTBINARYOP("0,2", "1,3", "0,^0", test11);
- if (virTestRun("test12", test12, NULL) < 0)
+ if (virTestRun("test12a", test12a, NULL) < 0)
+ ret = -1;
+ if (virTestRun("test12b", test12b, NULL) < 0)
ret = -1;
if (virTestRun("test13", test13, NULL) < 0)
ret = -1;
--
2.26.2