4:42 a.m.
On 07/10/2013 03:23 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 10.07.2013 09:03, schrieb Gao feng:
> On 07/10/2013 02:00 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Yes,actually libvirt did up the veth devices, that's why only veth2&
veth5 are down.
>>
>> Where does libvirt up the devices? The debug log does not contain any "ip
link set dev XXX up" commands.
>> Also in src/util/virnetdevveth.c I'm unable to find such a ip command.
>>
>
> virLXCProcessSetupInterfaceBridged calls virNetDevSetOnline.
Ahhhh, it's using an ioctl().
>>> I need to know why these two devices are down, I believe they were up, your
bridge and default-net
>>> looks good. So please show me your kernel message (dmesg), maybe it can give
us some useful information.
>>
>> This time veth4 and 5 are down.
>>
>> ---cut---
>
>> [ 44.158209] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth4: link is not ready
>> [ 44.473317] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth4: link becomes ready
>> [ 44.473400] virbr0: topology change detected, propagating
>> [ 44.473407] virbr0: port 5(veth4) entered forwarding state
>> [ 44.473423] virbr0: port 5(veth4) entered forwarding state
>
> veth4 were up here
>
>> [ 44.566186] device veth5 entered promiscuous mode
>> [ 44.571234] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth5: link is not ready
>> [ 44.571243] virbr0: topology change detected, propagating
>> [ 44.571250] virbr0: port 6(veth5) entered forwarding state
>> [ 44.571261] virbr0: port 6(veth5) entered forwarding state
>> [ 44.902308] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth5: link becomes ready
>> [ 45.000580] virbr0: port 5(veth4) entered disabled state
>
> and then it became down.
>
>> [ 45.348548] virbr0: port 6(veth5) entered disabled state
>
> So, Some places disable the veth4 and veth5.
> I don't know in which case these two devices will be disabled.
>
> I still can't reproduce this problem in my test bed :(
> I need more information to analyse why these two device being disabled.
>
> So, can you run kernel with the below debug patch?
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index d45e760..aed319b 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void br_stp_disable_port(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> p->state = BR_STATE_DISABLED;
> p->topology_change_ack = 0;
> p->config_pending = 0;
> -
> + dump_stack();
> br_log_state(p);
> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p);
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index faebb39..9b1617b 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1368,6 +1368,7 @@ static int dev_close_many(struct list_head *head)
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list) {
> rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, dev, IFF_UP|IFF_RUNNING);
> + dump_stack();
> call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_DOWN, dev);
> }
>
> @@ -4729,8 +4730,10 @@ void __dev_notify_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int
old_flags)
> if (changes & IFF_UP) {
> if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
> call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_UP, dev);
> - else
> + else {
> + dump_stack();
> call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_DOWN, dev);
> + }
> }
>
> if (dev->flags & IFF_UP &&
>
>
> Thanks!
>
There you go:
Thank you very much.
[ 129.084408] CPU: 1 PID: 4473 Comm: ip Not tainted 3.10.0+ #20
[ 129.084412] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 129.084415] ffff88003760d000 ffff88003ce7f798 ffffffff8172b2a6 ffff88003ce7f7b8
[ 129.084419] ffffffff8154be04 ffff88003760d000 0000000000001103 ffff88003ce7f7e8
[ 129.084422] ffffffff8154be60 0000000000000010 ffff88003760d000 ffff88003ce7f918
[ 129.084426] Call Trace:
[ 129.084821] virbr0: port 6(veth5) entered disabled state
I can confirm it's the ip command disable the veth device now.
but I still don't know who calls ip and why.
I search the libvirt code, there are no codes calling "ip link set xxx down".
It's so strange...
Give you an advice, modify the code of
ip(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git).
use read /proc/<getppid>/comm to trace which command calls ip.
ip/iplink.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ip/iplink.c b/ip/iplink.c
index dc98019..ec7ad87 100644
--- a/ip/iplink.c
+++ b/ip/iplink.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ int iplink_parse(int argc, char **argv, struct iplink_req *req,
int mtu = -1;
int netns = -1;
int vf = -1;
+ int down = 0;
int numtxqueues = -1;
int numrxqueues = -1;
@@ -293,8 +294,25 @@ int iplink_parse(int argc, char **argv, struct iplink_req *req,
req->i.ifi_change |= IFF_UP;
req->i.ifi_flags |= IFF_UP;
} else if (strcmp(*argv, "down") == 0) {
+ pid_t ppid = getppid();
+ char file[30];
+ char comm[20];
+ int fd;
+ memset(file, 0, sizeof(file));
+ memset(comm, 0, sizeof(comm));
+ down = 1;
req->i.ifi_change |= IFF_UP;
req->i.ifi_flags &= ~IFF_UP;
+
+ sprintf(file, "/proc/%d/comm", ppid);
+ fd = open(file, O_RDONLY);
+ read(fd, comm, sizeof(comm));
+ comm[strlen(comm) - 1] = '\0';
+ printf("pid %d, comm %s calls ip to down device", ppid, comm);
+ if (*dev)
+ printf(" %s\n", *dev);
+ close(fd);
+
} else if (strcmp(*argv, "name") == 0) {
NEXT_ARG();
*name = *argv;
@@ -475,6 +493,8 @@ int iplink_parse(int argc, char **argv, struct iplink_req *req,
if (*dev)
duparg2("dev", *argv);
*dev = *argv;
+ if (down)
+ printf(" dev %s\n", *dev);
}
argc--; argv++;
}
--
Thanks!