Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] cpu: Introduce ARM related structs

Introduce vendor and model struct and related cleanup functions for ARM cpu. Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Zheng <zhengzhenyulixi(a)gmail.com&gt; --- src/cpu/cpu_arm.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c b/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c index ee5802198f..d8f571cae3 100644 --- a/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_arm.c @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ /* * cpu_arm.c: CPU driver for arm CPUs * + * Copyright (C) 2020 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. * Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat, Inc. * Copyright (C) Canonical Ltd. 2012 * @@ -23,12 +24,16 @@ #include "viralloc.h" #include "cpu.h" +#include "cpu_arm.h" #include "cpu_map.h" +#include "virlog.h" #include "virstring.h" #include "virxml.h" #define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_CPU +VIR_LOG_INIT("cpu.cpu_arm"); + static const virArch archs[] = { VIR_ARCH_ARMV6L, VIR_ARCH_ARMV7B, @@ -36,6 +41,21 @@ static const virArch archs[] = { VIR_ARCH_AARCH64, }; +typedef struct _virCPUarmVendor virCPUarmVendor; +typedef virCPUarmVendor *virCPUarmVendorPtr; +struct _virCPUarmVendor { + char *name; + unsigned long value; +}; + +typedef struct _virCPUarmModel virCPUarmModel; +typedef virCPUarmModel *virCPUarmModelPtr; +struct _virCPUarmModel { + char *name; + virCPUarmVendorPtr vendor; + virCPUarmData data; +}; + typedef struct _virCPUarmFeature virCPUarmFeature; typedef virCPUarmFeature *virCPUarmFeaturePtr; struct _virCPUarmFeature { @@ -64,6 +84,10 @@ G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC(virCPUarmFeature, virCPUarmFeatureFree); typedef struct _virCPUarmMap virCPUarmMap; typedef virCPUarmMap *virCPUarmMapPtr; struct _virCPUarmMap { + size_t nvendors; + virCPUarmVendorPtr *vendors; + size_t nmodels; + virCPUarmModelPtr *models; GPtrArray *features; }; @@ -81,12 +105,62 @@ virCPUarmMapNew(void) return map; } +static void +virCPUarmDataClear(virCPUarmData *data) +{ + if (!data) + return; + + VIR_FREE(data->features); +} + +static void +virCPUarmDataFree(virCPUDataPtr cpuData) +{ + if (!cpuData) + return; + + virCPUarmDataClear(&cpuData->data.arm); + VIR_FREE(cpuData); +} + +static void +virCPUarmModelFree(virCPUarmModelPtr model) +{ + if (!model) + return; + + virCPUarmDataClear(&model->data); + g_free(model->name); + g_free(model); +} + +static void +virCPUarmVendorFree(virCPUarmVendorPtr vendor) +{ + if (!vendor) + return; + + g_free(vendor->name); + g_free(vendor); +} + static void virCPUarmMapFree(virCPUarmMapPtr map) { if (!map) return; + size_t i; + + for (i = 0; i < map->nmodels; i++) + virCPUarmModelFree(map->models[i]); + g_free(map->models); + + for (i = 0; i < map->nvendors; i++) + virCPUarmVendorFree(map->vendors[i]); + g_free(map->vendors); + g_ptr_array_free(map->features, TRUE); g_free(map); @@ -259,6 +333,7 @@ struct cpuArchDriver cpuDriverArm = { .compare = virCPUarmCompare, .decode = NULL, .encode = NULL, + .dataFree = virCPUarmDataFree, .baseline = virCPUarmBaseline, .update = virCPUarmUpdate, .validateFeatures = virCPUarmValidateFeatures, -- 2.26.0.windows.1 On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:16 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: