On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 12:35 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > No rush, I see Michal has yet another proposal for this that we haven't
> > considered and even though there are somedrawbacks to that as well, it
> > looks nicer than this.
> >
> > After all the ideas I'm starting to like the "gross" one the
best. Oh
> > my =)
>
> My vote still goes to this solution, because having a placeholder seems
> more explicit and easier to follow than doing s/lo/lo0/ directly.
I vote for Michal's approach as it doesn't require us to
disable VIR_TEST_REGENERATE_OUTPUT.
Well, it does. Kinda. You *must not* regenerate output on FreeBSD with
his patch, so it should be explicitly disabled.
I can't make up my mind, currently I'm inclining to your solution with
multiple files, so I'll let you guys decide.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization