On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:57:38PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:22:07 +0000
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:58:44PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Make sure the thread related controls of the machine cgroup never
> > get any tasks assigned.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild(a)siemens.com>
> > ---
> > src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> NACK This also won't work for same reason as previous patch
Having that in place can still be useful after we have sorted out the
random result of what systemd gave us.
Is the general idea of such an assertion a good idea, and should i
adopt it according to comments?
At the moment i just used the assertion mask in the only code-path that
adds tasks within libvirt. If we have to deal with manipulation from
the outside, it might be a good idea to introduce more assertions based
on the mask.
Without patch 4 though, there's nowhere you can put this afaict.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|