On 28/01/2011, at 3:29 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/27/2011 09:20 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 28/01/2011, at 3:19 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Do we need three examples, or would two be sufficient?
>>
>> For example, vSphere/ESX has a 4MB granularity, so 263168 (257MB) would
>> be rejected while 266240 (260MB) is valid.
>
> Yeah, that'd work too. I'll just that example then push it.
In case it wasn't clear:
ACK with nits addressed, no need to see a v2; let's go ahead and get
this pushed with the minor fix incorporated :)
Thanks Eric, pushed. :)