On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 15:30:20 +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 5/13/25 09:53, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 15:37:13 +0200, Michal Privoznik via Devel wrote:
>> From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
>>
>> In virnetlink.c there are two sections: the first one when
>> building WITH_LIBNL support, the other that provides stubs for
>> functions declared in the corresponding header file when building
>> without netlink support. But the stub implementation for
>> virNetlinkBridgeVlanFilterSet() was missing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>> src/util/virnetlink.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/util/virnetlink.c b/src/util/virnetlink.c
>> index 206646d9d7..2555457cd2 100644
>> --- a/src/util/virnetlink.c
>> +++ b/src/util/virnetlink.c
>> @@ -1344,6 +1344,17 @@ virNetlinkNewLink(const char *ifname G_GNUC_UNUSED,
>> }
>>
>>
>> +int
>> +virNetlinkBridgeVlanFilterSet(const char *ifname G_GNUC_UNUSED,
>> + int cmd G_GNUC_UNUSED,
>> + const unsigned short fflags G_GNUC_UNUSED,
>
> s/fflags/flags/
No, this needs to be anything else but 'flags' otherwise our
sc_flags_usage syntax-check rule will complain. unusedflags perhaps?
Ah ... d'oh. I mentioned it just because some static analysis tool
complained about argument names differing between definition and
declaration;
Anyways 'unusedflags' would likely be preferrable.