Hi,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:06:18PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
On 08/31/2015 03:25 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
>Hi,
>On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:19:10PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
>>Adds a new interface type using UDP sockets, this seems only applicable
>>to QEMU but have edited tree-wide to support the new interface type.
>>
>>The interface type required the addition of a "localaddr" (local
>>address), this then maps into the following xml and qemu call.
>>
>><interface type='udp'>
>
>
>Sine we do have
>
> <interface type='mcast'>
>
>already wouldn't it be better to have something like
>
> <interface type='ucast' protocol='udp'>
>
This possibly could be better, my concern would be now tcp is configured
differently than udp, no? Or are you saying something like:
tcp client/server is configured with
<interface type='server'>
atm which fits as well. That said I don't have a strong opinion on that
one.
<interface type='ucast' protocol='udp|tcp'>
My concern here is this would be a bigger change and does libvirt have a
stable xml configuration guarantee?
XML of older lbvirt must be parseable by newer ones, yes.
Cheers,
-- Guido