Re: [libvirt] Need a better word than "allocated" or "ascertained"
On 07/01/2011, at 6:12 PM, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
<snip>
> Guaranteed sounds best to me.
>
Thats not Gauranteed to the best of my knowlegde
Balbir suggest "enforced", I guessed i dropped it somewhere.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-August/msg00712.html
Balbir's suggested wording (from the email):
"limit to enforce on memory contention"
Does that mean it's the minimum memory "limit" it would really like to
have, but can't guarantee it? (ie it's not guaranteed)