On 06/21/2013 01:30 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> If networkUnplugBandwidth is called on a network which has
> no bandwidth defined, print a warning instead of crashing.
>
> This can happen when destroying a domain with bandwith if
s/bandwith/bandwidth
> bandwidth was removed from the network after the domain was
> started.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975359
> ---
> src/network/bridge_driver.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> index f7c2470..72a3f70 100644
> --- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> +++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c
> @@ -4808,6 +4808,11 @@ networkUnplugBandwidth(virNetworkObjPtr net,
>
> if (iface->data.network.actual &&
> iface->data.network.actual->class_id) {
> + if (!net->def->bandwidth || !net->def->bandwidth->in) {
> + VIR_WARN("Network %s has no bandwidth but unplug requested",
> + net->def->name);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> /* we must remove class from bridge */
> new_rate = net->def->bandwidth->in->average;
>
>
I don't know the code well enough - I can understand why there's a crash
if bandwidth == NULL; however, it wasn't clear to me whether or not it
might be necessary to make the other calls that didn't rely on bandwidth
!= NULL but do pass/use class_id.
John
If I understand it correctly: if the network has no bandwidth, its bridge
shouldn't have any class_ids set and there should be nothing to clean up.
Jan