On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 01:50:50PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
Currently we had hard-coded `zanata` as a name of the binary, but
it can also be `zanata-cli`.
FWIW, I hardcoded 'zanata' for two reasons
- It is a light weight python client, compared to the java
client which pulls in a huge dep chains.
- I found the java client unreliable eg several times when
pushing a new .pot file, it pushed the pot but failed to tell
the server to preserve existing translations, so we lost all
translations.
I'd hope the latter is fixed now, but honestly I would still
not recommend using the java client, when the python client
is working nicely.
Is there a particular reason you wanted to make it autodetect ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|