On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 06:35:54PM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:46:12PM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 10:22:38AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:47:48PM +0200, Wojtek Porczyk wrote:
> > > > I encountered one small problem, which I believe is orthogonal to the
patch series:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 03:31:32PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/examples/event-test.py b/examples/event-test.py
> > > > > index 751a140..ac9fbe1 100755
> > > > > --- a/examples/event-test.py
> > > > > +++ b/examples/event-test.py
> > > >
> > > > > + netcallbacks = []
> > > > > + netcallbacks.append(vc.networkEventRegisterAny(None,
libvirt.VIR_NETWORK_EVENT_ID_LIFECYCLE, myNetworkEventLifecycleCallback, None))
> > > >
> > > > With vc = libvirt.open('xen:///') and with
libvirt{,-python}-3.1.0 this line causes an
> > > > exception:
> > > >
> > > > libvirt.libvirtError: this function is not supported by the
> > > > connection driver: virConnectNetworkEventRegisterAny
> > > >
> > > > Commenting it out solves the problem.
> > >
> > > Yes, I must say the event test is only validated with the KVM driver, but
that said
> > > I thought the Xen driver would get our default nework driver activated
automatically,
> > > so I'm surprised you see that.
> >
> > I don't know, maybe this is caused by our setup. For example we have no NIC
in
> > dom0 (only loopback) and we also may have deliberately broken something around
> > the network.
>
> Yes, our packages have ./configure (...) --without-network.
So looks like our fault. Sorry for that.
No problem, good to know everything's working as expected
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|