On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:02:35PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
On 7/5/23 8:20 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
> Enable by default asynchronous teardown on S390 hosts and add tests for
> asynchronous teardown autogeneration support.
> On S390 hosts, Secure Execution guests can take a long time to shutdown,
> since the memory cleanup can take a long time. Since there is no
> practical way to determine whether a S390 guest is running in Secure
> Execution mode, and since the asynchronous teardown does not impact
> normal (not Secure Execution) guests or guests without large memory
> configurations, we enable asynchronous teardown by default on S390.
> A user can select to override the default in the guest domain XML.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski<fiuczy(a)linux.ibm.com>
> ---
As it turns out the discussion seems to be on this patch only.
Would it be acceptable to push the first four patches off the series without
the fifth patch?
Yes, that's fine.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|