On 07/31/2012 06:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/31/2012 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com>
>
> There are a few issues with the current virAtomic APIs
>
> - They require use of a virAtomicInt struct instead of a plain
> int type
> - Several of the methods do not implement memory barriers
> - The methods do not implement compiler re-ordering barriers
> - There is no Win32 native impl
>
Reviewing the next part out of order, so as to hit implementation before
client's use of the implementation.
> diff --git a/src/util/viratomic.c b/src/util/viratomic.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..af846ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/util/viratomic.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
Oh, one more thing - run 'make syntax-check before pushing, and fix these:
copyright_address
src/util/viratomic.c:22: * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330,
Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
tests/viratomictest.c:16: * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite
330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
maint.mk: Point to <
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>, not an address
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org