Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/24/2011 11:22 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> The cur_vcpus member of struct libxl_domain_build_info was incorrectly
> initialized to the number of vcpus, when it should have been interpreted
> as a bitmap, where bit X corresponds to online/offline status of vcpuX.
>
> To complicate matters, cur_vcpus is an int, so only 32 vcpus can be
> set online. Add a check to ensure vcpus does not exceed this limit.
>
> V2: Eric Blake noted a compilation pitfal when '1 << 32' on an int.
>
If you keep the V2 message in your commit log, then s/pitfal/pitfall/
(personally, I tend to drop V2 messages when pushing - they are handy
during review to point out what to look for, but once it is part of
history, I no longer care how many versions it took to get to the final
pushed version).
> Account for vcpus == 32.
>
> + * as an int, but its' semantic is a bitmap of online vcpus, so
>
s/its'/its/
(That is, drop the spurious apostrophe).
> b_info->hvm = hvm;
> b_info->max_vcpus = def->maxvcpus;
> - b_info->cur_vcpus = def->vcpus;
> + if (def->vcpus == 32)
> + b_info->cur_vcpus = 1 << 31;
>
Still wrong. You want 32 bits, not one bit:
b_info->cur_vcpus = (uint32_t) -1;
Err, right - I should address _all_ previous comments.
> + else
> + b_info->cur_vcpus = (1 << def->vcpus) - 1;
> if (def->clock.ntimers > 0 &&
> def->clock.timers[0]->name == VIR_DOMAIN_TIMER_NAME_TSC) {
> switch (def->clock.timers[0]->mode) {
>
ACK with those changes.
And this time I have. Changes made and pushed.
Thanks,
Jim