Re: [PATCH] rpm: Fix handling of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
On 10/27/20 1:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 6:24 AM Michal Privoznik
<mprivozn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/26/20 11:08 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Contemporary versions of Fedora automatically set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
>> based on the changelog entry date stamp. In scenarios where it already
>> is defined, we do not want to redefine it.
>>
>
> This part is okay.
>
>> Additionally, when building the libvirt package in an Open Build Service
>> instance, the spec file is not present in %_specdir, but instead in %_sourcedir.
>>
>
> But this looks fishy. Is the %_specdir defined in that case?
>
It is (that comes from RPM itself), however the directory is empty.
That feels like a bug in OBS then. IIUC this macro can be specified on
the rpmbuild's cmd line. Can't it set the %_specdir to be the same as
%_sourcedir?
Michal