On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:10:11AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
On 1/15/19 8:23 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> @@ -894,79 +981,10 @@ int virQEMUDriverConfigLoadFile(virQEMUDriverConfigPtr cfg,
> goto cleanup;
> if (virConfGetValueBool(conf, "auto_start_bypass_cache",
&cfg->autoStartBypassCache) < 0)
> goto cleanup;
> -
> - if (virConfGetValueStringList(conf, "hugetlbfs_mount", true,
> - &hugetlbfs) < 0)
> - goto cleanup;
> - if (hugetlbfs) {
> - /* There already might be something autodetected. Avoid leaking it. */
> - while (cfg->nhugetlbfs) {
> - cfg->nhugetlbfs--;
> - VIR_FREE(cfg->hugetlbfs[cfg->nhugetlbfs].mnt_dir);
> - }
> - VIR_FREE(cfg->hugetlbfs);
> -
> - cfg->nhugetlbfs = virStringListLength((const char *const *)hugetlbfs);
> - if (hugetlbfs[0] &&
> - VIR_ALLOC_N(cfg->hugetlbfs, cfg->nhugetlbfs) < 0)
> - goto cleanup;
> -
> - for (i = 0; hugetlbfs[i] != NULL; i++) {
> - if (virQEMUDriverConfigHugeTLBFSInit(&cfg->hugetlbfs[i],
> - hugetlbfs[i], i != 0) < 0)
> - goto cleanup;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (virConfGetValueString(conf, "bridge_helper",
&cfg->bridgeHelperName) < 0)
> - goto cleanup;
> -
> - if (virConfGetValueString(conf, "pr_helper",
&cfg->prHelperName) < 0)
> goto cleanup;
This makes a double "goto cleanup;" which you fix in the next patch, but
causes this patch to fail to compile...
Fun, clang does not mind at all.
I found another occurrence in a later patch.
Jano
With all that this patch is good.
John
[...]