On 03/29/2010 10:37 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Another one caught by clang:
Note the first test to see if "inst" may be NULL.
Then, in the following loop, "inst" is unconditionally
dereferenced via "inst[i]". There are other unprotected
used of "inst[i]" below, too.
Rather than trying to protect all uses, one by one, I chose
to return "success" when given an empty list of rules.
ACK that your patch is the minimal fix to avoid a segfault, but we
should probably get Stefan's input on whether returning success on an
empty input is the best course of behavior.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org