On 07/26/2013 07:22 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> It appears it was an optional cutover and I guess Gentoo made the
> plunge. Another idea, that you might hate would be to use pkg-config
> directly and pass --static so we can get the private libraries. I'm
> not running Fedora 19 yet so the best I can do is give you Fedora 18
> as a comp, but that works out great since its using 2.12.23 as well.
>
> stable Gentoo:
>
> Name: GnuTLS
> Description: Transport Security Layer implementation for the GNU system
> URL:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/
> Version: 2.12.23
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lgnutls
> Libs.private: -L/usr/lib64 -lnettle -lgmp -lhogweed
> Requires.private: libtasn1 , zlib
> Cflags: -I${includedir}
>
> $ pkg-config --libs --static gnutls
> -lgnutls -ltasn1 -lz -lnettle -lgmp -lhogweed
>
> Fedora 18:
>
> Name: GnuTLS
> Description: Transport Security Layer implementation for the GNU system
> URL:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/
> Version: 2.12.23
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lgnutls
> Libs.private: -L/usr/lib64 -lgcrypt -L/usr/lib64 -lgpg-error
> Requires.private: libtasn1 , zlib, p11-kit-1
> Cflags: -I${includedir}
>
> $ pkg-config --libs --static gnutls
> -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -ltasn1 -lz -lp11-kit
>
> With GnuTLS 3.2 I get the following:
>
> pkg-config --libs --static gnutls
> -lgnutls -lhogweed -lnettle -lz -lgmp
>
>
> Maybe that helps?
Unfortunately, no:
Fedora 19:
$ pkg-config --libs --static gnutls
-lgnutls -lnettle -lhogweed -lgmp -lpthread -ltasn1 -lp11-kit -lz
Correct - nettle instead of gcrypt.
RHEL 6.4:
$ pkg-config --libs --static gnutls
-lgnutls -ltasn1
Ouch - no mention of gcrypt, even though this version still used gcrypt.
Well that's not really to problematic. RHEL 6.4 uses gnutls 2.8.x
which didn't have any concept of nettle at that point. nettle wasn't
introduced as a supported backend until 2.12 [1]. So let's rework the
patch to assume libgcrypt before gnutls 2.12 and then starting with
2.12 we double probe for nettle or libgcrypt.
[1]