Re: [libvirt] [Gluster-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Qemu/Gluster support in Libvirt

Hi, Harsh: I make some break in glusterd , and can gdb the qemu-kvm forked from libvirtd. break in glusterd: (gdb) i b Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x00007f903ef1a0a0 in server_getspec at glusterd-handshake.c:122 2 breakpoint keep y 0x00000034f4607070 in rpcsvc_program_actor at rpcsvc.c:137 breakpoint already hit 2 times 3 breakpoint keep y 0x00007f903ef199f0 in glusterd_set_clnt_mgmt_program at glusterd-handshake.c:359 4 breakpoint keep y 0x00007f903ef1a0a0 in server_getspec at glusterd-handshake.c:122 in rpcsvc_handle_rpc_call fun, it call rpcsvc_program_actor and return right. (gdb) p *actor $13 = {procname = "GETSPEC", '\000' <repeats 24 times>, procnum = 2, actor = 0x7f903ef1a0a0 <server_getspec>, vector_sizer = 0, unprivileged = _gf_false} but in if(0==svc->allow_insecure&&unprivileged&&!actor->unprivileged){ /* Non-privileged user, fail request */ gf_log("glusterd",GF_LOG_ERROR, "Request received from non-" "privileged port. Failing request"); rpcsvc_request_destroy(req); return-1; } so the server_getspec on server not be called, which cause qemu-kvm progress failed. my question: 1.(0==svc->allow_insecure&&unprivileged&&!actor->unprivileged) which one wrong here ? Best Regards, Yin Yin