On 5/17/22 10:34, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> This remains, and that's fine. One step at time.
> Not sure how we want to proceed with that in the long run, though
> ... IIRC clearly, Paolo once said that it doesn't really belong into
> "-display" anyway and should be handled with the separate "-vnc"
> option instead?
Not me, Gerd
(
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210825092023.81396-2-thuth@redhat.com/T/#e8...):
> Other way around, -display vnc should be dropped. -display is about
> local displays, and there can be only one instance. -vnc / -spice
> enable remote access, and this can be done in addition to a local
> display.
> not possible:
> -display gtk + -display sdl
> possible:
> -display gtk + -vnc
> -display gtk + -vnc + -spice
> -display none + -vnc + -spice
For what it's worth, Libvirt uses both -vnc and -spice, so we might
very well proceed with Gerd's idea. If we don't like -vnc and -spice
then it may be possible to QOMify them and go with -object.