Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] Re: Supporting hypervisor specific APIs in libvirt
On 03/25/2010 10:26 AM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
On 24/03/10 21:40, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> If so, what C clients you expected beyond libvirt?
>
> Users want a C API. I don't agree that libvirt is the only C
> interface consumer out there.
(I've seen this written too many times ...)
How do you know that ? did you do a poll or something where *actual*
users vote/tell ?
From my point of view, i wouldn't want to write a high level
management toolstack in C, specially
since the API is well defined JSON which is easily available in all
high level language out there.
Strongly agreed. Even the managementy bits of qemu (anything around
QObject) are suffering from the lowleveledness of C.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function