Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] storage: kill dead stores

> @@ -75,7 +73,7 @@ virStorageBackendProbeTarget(virStorageVolTargetPtr target, > allocation, > capacity)) < 0) { > close(fd); > - return -1; > + return ret; Why do you return ret here? Doing so doesn't harm but it's not necessary, virStorageBackendUpdateVolTargetInfoFD returns 0 or -1 only, in contrast to virStorageBackendVolOpenCheckMode that can return 0, -1 or -2.

ACK.