On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:16:00PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Add a Red Hat style init script, using the service name
> libvirt_qemud.
I'm wondering about the future where we have Rich's libvirtd to start
up too. Perhaps we should call the init script just 'libvirtd' and
in the future it can either start both libvirt_qemud & libvirtd or
if we merge the two, just start libvirtd. That way we won't have to
worry about possible renaming of the init script during an update.
Sounds good to me, how about just re-naming the daemon to libvirtd
too ?
Cheers,
Mark.