Thanks Daniel,
Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a
more
complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux
hypervisor support.
Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more?
By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the libvirtd
running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)?
Thanks.
-Yushu
On 9/5/08 11:27 AM, "Daniel Veillard" <veillard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:19:47AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just wondering has anyone successfully ported libvirt to Mac yet?
>>
>> If yes, could you give some instructions. If not, is there any plans?
>
> Well there is porting, which means just being able to compile it
> without any hypervisor support allowing to do remote access (like for
> the current Windows port) and that should not be too hard on MacOS-X
> due to its UNIX lineage.
Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a
more
complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux
hypervisor support.
>
> In any case, portability patches are welcome !
>
> Daniel